Skip to content

Conversation

sjwang05
Copy link
Contributor

Closes #58462

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Dec 27, 2023

r? @WaffleLapkin

(rustbot has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Dec 27, 2023
@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Dec 27, 2023
@sjwang05
Copy link
Contributor Author

@rustbot review

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. labels Dec 27, 2023
.dcx()
.create_err(InvalidMetaItem { span: self.token.span, token: self.token.clone() }))
let token = self.token.clone();
let (sugg, or_ident) = if self.prev_token == token::Eq && !self.token.span.from_expansion()
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please add a comment about what this check does, exactly, and why we only accept identifiers in the else (I'm also pretty sure identifiers are unrelated to expansions?...)

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Added a comment explaining the check, including the from_expansion().

why we only accept identifiers in the else

From briefly glancing over attributes-related tests, it seemed like the "or identifier" would be valid for the remaining cases covered by the else branch, e.g.

//~^ ERROR expected unsuffixed literal or identifier, found `n!()`

@rustbot review

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Dec 27, 2023
@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. labels Jan 3, 2024
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jan 4, 2024

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #119578) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

Copy link
Member

@WaffleLapkin WaffleLapkin left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This looks good to me! 🙂

Please rebase this PR to resolve conflicts.

Marking as S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. , once you've fixed the conflicts, please use @rustbot review (learn more about rustbot commands). @rustbot author.

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jan 12, 2024
@sjwang05
Copy link
Contributor Author

Rebased, thanks for the help.

@rustbot review

@rustbot rustbot removed the S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. label Jan 13, 2024
@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Jan 13, 2024
@WaffleLapkin
Copy link
Member

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jan 14, 2024

📌 Commit aa8ecd0 has been approved by WaffleLapkin

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jan 14, 2024
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jan 14, 2024

⌛ Testing commit aa8ecd0 with merge aa5f781...

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jan 14, 2024

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: WaffleLapkin
Pushing aa5f781 to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Jan 14, 2024
@bors bors merged commit aa5f781 into rust-lang:master Jan 14, 2024
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.77.0 milestone Jan 14, 2024
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (aa5f781): comparison URL.

Overall result: ❌✅ regressions and improvements - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
0.3% [0.3%, 0.3%] 1
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-0.4% [-0.4%, -0.4%] 1
All ❌✅ (primary) 0.3% [0.3%, 0.3%] 1

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
1.0% [1.0%, 1.0%] 1
Improvements ✅
(primary)
-4.5% [-4.5%, -4.5%] 1
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-2.2% [-2.2%, -2.2%] 1
All ❌✅ (primary) -4.5% [-4.5%, -4.5%] 1

Cycles

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
2.9% [2.9%, 2.9%] 1
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) 2.9% [2.9%, 2.9%] 1

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 664.704s -> 666.086s (0.21%)
Artifact size: 308.20 MiB -> 308.21 MiB (0.00%)

@sjwang05 sjwang05 deleted the issue-58462 branch January 16, 2024 03:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Diagnostic for #[cfg(ident=ident)] fails to suggest #[cfg(ident="string")]
6 participants